They believed it was driven by James Andanson, who was in the pay of MI6. He died two years later in what they claim was suspicious circumstances. But police called it suicide, pointing out that Andanson had an alibi and his white Fiat Uno was too dilapidated to drive the miles from Andanson's country house to Paris. The white Fiat Uno driver has never been identified but experts at the inquest said it would be almost impossible to engineer a crash, and Diana might have lived if she was wearing a seatbelt.
Along with the mystery Fiat Uno doubters believe there was a "massive flash" of light in the tunnel moments before the Mercedes crashed. A man purporting himself to be a witness to the accident, Francois Levistre, told newspapers that he thought the Mercedes lost control after being "blinded" by a light.
Later Richard Tomlinson, the former MI6 officer, claimed that a similar method was suggested as part of a plan to assassinate former Serbian leader Slobodan Milosevic in But during the inquest Richard Tomlinson backtracked on his claim under cross examination.
And there was little support for the bright light theory, with numerous witnesses denying they saw a massive flash. Eventually, even Al Fayed's lawyers agreed that the Fiat Uno was not a contributory cause of the crash. The driver has never been identified. Return to the top of the page Why did it take so long to get Diana to hospital? It took nearly two hours to get Princess Diana from the scene of the accident to La Pitie-Salpetriere Hospital, only four miles away.
In France, it is standard procedure to send an ambulance with a fully-equipped team of doctors and nurses to assess the victim's injuries and administer care immediately. Diana's condition was unstable. She suffered two heart attacks, one while being removed from the wreckage of the car, and another while on the way to hospital. The French authorities told The Conspiracy Files that her ambulance drove deliberately slowly to not further upset her injuries.
Conspiracy theorists argue that Princess Diana would have been saved if the ambulance had rushed her off to hospital. They also point to the fact that Diana's ambulance passed five other hospitals along the way, including one reserved for VIPs.
But during the inquest the jury heard that the La Pitie-Salpetriere Hospital was chosen because of its expertise in chest trauma, which meant it had the best facilities to treat Diana.
Some expert witnesses, however, did suggest that Diana might have been saved if she had got to hospital quicker. Return to the top of the page Was Diana engaged to Dodi? Sceptics claim that Princess Diana was pregnant with Dodi's baby and that she was murdered to avoid causing trouble to the establishment. Conspiracists point to the fact that the princess was embalmed in Paris, hours after the crash, before a full autopsy had taken place on her body.
Embalming is not only illegal in France, say the theorists, but the formaldehyde used in the process would have corrupted the results of a pregnancy test and given a false result. Conspiracy theorists claim that the princess was also engaged to Dodi, and that the couple were about to announce their engagement. The guerilla plant. Walking away. BBC Copyright Notice. Terms of Use Privacy Policy. Printable version. Public doubts over Diana accident.
The driver of Diana's car was held to blame for the crash, and found to be drunk and driving at excessive speed. The new evidence shows the French authorities were right to conclude that Diana's driver was drunk and the conspiracists are wrong to suggest he was framed after his death to cover-up the alleged secret service plot.
An opinion poll for The Conspiracy Files suggests there is strong support for the conspiracy that Princess Diana's death in a car crash was not an accident. The BBC opinion poll suggests the Stevens inquiry will be an important milestone in the closure of the many issues surrounding the death of Princess Diana.
The French verdict, it seems, has so far failed to satisfy the public desire for answers. The question asked was: "Princess Diana died in a car crash in Paris in On no other occasion in history has a building with steel support collapsed due to fire unless you count the twin towers that collapsed earlier that day with the planes hitting them starting fires before they collapsed.
It was very similar but much more symmetrical than examples of controlled demolition shown in the programme, indicating that something more advanced than conventional explosives was used. A thermite explosion was demonstrated in a lab. He said he went into an emergency response centre that was empty but had still hot coffee, heard explosions within the building and stepped over bodies despite the official story that there was no loss of life in that building.
Some people have criticised Jane for being part of the conspiracy but it seems that she was just fed that not yet up-to-date information. The official explanation was that a satellite subscription had expired and an automatic timer kicked in - but I've never heard of that happening on any other occasion and for it to happen then hardly seems to be a coincidence!
The programme said this showed it was "a cock-up rather than a conspiracy", but it certainly could be part of a massive conspiracy! If you take one particular item from the above list, it may be possible to concoct a fairly plausible story, and the programme did give some official but not particularly plausible explanations, but them all happening on the same day: a coincidence?
However, there was some very convincing evidence of a conspiracy towards the start of that programme, with the second half concentrating on views of the establishment which viewers tended to forget due to receiving a lot of complex information and a limited amount of short term memory. This certainly confirms the controlled demolition theory. Somebody on my "assassination-of-princess-diana" discussion group at Yahoo! When I checked Rabinowitz's website more recently I noticed that it tended to promote some of the less convincing conspiracy ideas, and I have just checked it again which appears to confirm my suspicion that Rabinowitz is an agent of the establishment.
0コメント